× This is not the latest version. This is version 1 from 10 years ago. View latest or show what's different from the latest version.

Patent Application Template & Notes - Version 1

This is a template for a Utility Patent.
For novelty purposes only. Using this template without a lawyer is a bad idea.

Inventor:       Jane Doe




Title. Realtime Cloudbased Mobile Web App and Social Rootkit

 500 characters max. Title does not directly affect your rights. Keep it simple, broad and useful


Cross References to Related Applications. This application claims the benefit of Applicants’ prior provisional application, number 00/000,000, filed on January 1, 2012. Identify any prior related patents you have filed.


Field of Invention. The technology relates to the general field of X, and has certain specific application to Y.

Keep it short and general here. You may not need a "Field of Invention" section at all.



Length:    ~250 to 350 Words.

Purpose:    Broadly identify the problem that the invention solves.  Lay groundwork for "Indicia of Non-Obviousness": Unexpected results, Solution to Long-Standing Problem, Other scientists tried to invent this and failed.

Strategy:    Use Examples, not Boilerplate. Do not admit anything is prior art.



Briefly summarize the invention. Hit the important components, but don't use limiting language. This can be tricky.

The disclosed THING does RESULTS. It may be used by EXAMLEs.

Length:    ~250 to 350 Words

Purpose:    Summarize Invention.

2º Purpose:   Lay groundwork for Indicia of Non-Obviousness: Unexpected results, Solution to Long-Standing Problem, Other inventors tried and failed.

Strategy:    Use Examples, not Boilerplate.


Brief Description of the Drawings


Various embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following detailed description and accompanying drawings.

Fig. 1 illustrates a [three-quarter view of the crankshaft wingnut assembly].

Fig. 2 illustrates an [exploded view of the clockwork linchpin]

Fig. 3 illustrates ...



Detailed Description and Preferred Embodiment


The following is a detailed description of exemplary embodiments to illustrate the principles of the invention. The embodiments are provided to illustrate aspects of the invention, but the invention is not limited to any embodiment. The scope of the invention encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalent; it is limited only by the claims.

Numerous specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, the invention may be practiced according to the claims without some or all of these specific details. For the purpose of clarity, technical material that is known in the technical fields related to the invention has not been described in detail so that the invention is not unnecessarily obscured.


I like to include a brief definition of important terms. Many attorneys do not. If you define terms, be careful not avoid limiting the scope of your invention or claims.

A. Computer-Readable Medium - is broadly defined to include any kind of computer memory, including, hard disks, solid state drives, flash drives, CDs and DVDs, and RAM.

B. Subliminal Transmogrifier - is a fine gossamer oxidizer for a wrought iron piston fuse. 

C. Clickable Mousover - is a pixelated peer-to-peer digital breadcrumb for mobile apps. 


Figure 1 - A Mechanical Component.

The summary gave the overview of the invention. Now its time to dig into the details. 

Figure 1 illustrates an overview of a preferred embodiment. It is a three-quarter view of the crankshaft wingnut assembly.


Mechanicam Component Checklist.

If the invention has a mechanical component, try to describe: a. Shape, Size, b. Configuration, c. Orientation d. Function, e. Cooperation with other elements, f. Material, and g. Substitutes


Figure 2 - A Software Component

Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of a preferred embodiment. Data is received from the femtosecond authentication array and concatenated with a cascading RESTful API call. Logarithmic read-only sampling of broadband metadata is developed in a bloatware feedback sequence.   

For a Software or Business Method Patent, use this structure: a. System context,  b. Overview of Major Components,  c. Details of Major Components d. Examples of operation System context.  

Emphasize the relationship between the hardware and software.

Use a block diagram of the system context.

Components:    Identify each major software component. How do the components interact? What data structures are used? What algorithms adjust the data? What data gets passed to the next major compnent?  

Physical Components: Identify physical resources. This may seem unnecessary to a software developer, but its critical for patents. You can't patent software as an abstraction. However, it is often possible to patent software  in relation to specific physical hardware and physical outcomes.

Block Diagram: Use block diagrams to illustrate the components, data structures, data objects and physical resources.

Details:    Write out component details in high-level “pseudo-code” and associate each block of pseudo code with a block in some flow-chart.

Examples:    Write an example a non-programmer can understand.


Note. Different examples and embodiments should use synonyms to describe similar or even identical features of the different embodiments.

Another Component

Figure 3 depicts another component....


Alternate Embodiment

Figure 5 depicts an alternate embodiment.

Describing alternative versions of your invention is important. It will help broaden the scope of the patent rights.



Conclusion. The disclosed embodiments are illustrative, not restrictive. While specific configurations of the [technology] have been described, it is understood that the present invention can be applied to a wide variety of [technology category]. There are many alternative ways of implementing the invention.

Boilerplate:    The Federal Circuit recently relied on this exact boilerplate in Honeywell Int'l, Inc. v. United States, to expand patent rights. 596 F.3d 800, 807-10 (Fed. Cir. 2010).





a. Damages. Consistently emphasize any close interrelationships between the invention (the new part) and the larger system (most of the overall system will be old technology). For example, emphasize how the improvement to this sub-feature will materially enhance the performance or commercial appeal of the overall system. This sets the stage for “System Level Damages.”


b. Multiple Embodiments. Multiple embodiments are required. Otherwise, courts likely to limit invention to the single disclosed embodiment.




The claims identify the parts of the technology that are actually new. The claims define your rights. The language here should be Broad but Specific. 

What is Claimed is:

  1. A realtime, cloud-based, mobile web app for social jalbreaking, comprising: 
    1. a Turing test,
    2. a vaporware firewall, and 
    3. a keystroke logging rootkit. 

      This is an "Independent Claim." It stands on its own. Its the broadest type of claim. Formalities. There are some rules you have to follow (don't look for a rationale). Independent claims start with "A" or "An" and use the word "Comprising." All claims, Dependent or Independent, are a Complete Sentence (often run-on). 
  2. The web app of claim one, wherein, 
    1. the Turing test receives version tracking data from the rootkit.

      This is a "Dependent Claim." It refers back to a previous claim. It also narrow the scope of the previous claim by adding an  additional "Limitation." 

Here are some different claim flavors from the claim buffet: 

  1. Apparatus Claim.
    1. "A computer system comprising..." list components necessary for processing
  2. Component Apparatus Claims. Claim the innovative component alone, and then claim it as part of a broader system:
    1. A disk drive comprising X, Y and Z.
    2. A computer system comprising a disk drive, X, Y and Z.
  3. Method Claim. Claim the steps in a process.
    1. Each claim should be specific to the actions of a particular party involved in distribution (don’t require a step from the user and a step from the user in the same claim).

  4. Product by Process Claim.
    1. Use if structure of invention is difficult to describe.
    2. But, this type of claim is only infringed by a product made by a substantially identical process.

  5. Computer Readable Medium (Beauregard) claim.

  6. Means-Plus-Function / Step-Plus-Function Claims.


§ 112 ¶ 6 limits functional claim scope to “structure, material or acts described in the specification and equivalents thereof.” Using words “means for” or “step for” creates a presumption of § 112 ¶ 6 limits.  Without these words, there is a   presumption that the § 112 ¶ 6 "means plus function" rule does not apply .
Use means plus function claims, but don’t rely on them solely.


  1. Strategic Claiming.
    1. Avoid "Restriction Requirements" from the Patent Examiner. 
      1. Glue Claim - A glue claim recites every limitation of every independent claim verbatim.
      2. Nephew Claims - Each independent claim has a dependent claim that corresponds to every other independent claim.

General Claiming Notes

Describe invention:   Language should be inclusive, but not ambiguous. Specific and comprehensive. § 112 ¶ 2.
Claim Novel Tools and Manufacturing as well as End Product.
Claim intermediate products in the manufacturing process.

Language:    Draft some claims using terms that are not in the specification.  If the verbatim term (as opposed to the concept) is used in the specification, it may be easier for an opponent to later argue that the claim scope should be limited to the description in the specification (as opposed to the broader underlying inventive concept).

Infringement:    Try to claim Direct, Detectable, Undivided, Domestic Activity.
Is the claim directed at a party with deep pocket?
If multiple deep pocket parties, draft claims targeted at each one.
Litigators want claim language that identifies specific features and can be readily applied to an accused product.

Damages:    Aim for System-Level Damages. One of the claims should be directed to the entire system.


A system for X is disclosed. The system DOES SOME THINGS. The disclosed system PRODUCES SOME RESULTS.

150 words max. The purpose of the Abstract is to help classify the invention in the Patent Office. 




Eric Adler

4 267,023 14

Public Document

Number of times Signed
Number of Saves
Number of Downloads
Number of Views

This is version 1, from 10 years ago.

Suggest changes by making a copy of this document. Learn more.

Create Branch